And I thought the world was ending when Linus started top posting ... On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 00:40 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > James, and comments on this? You mean apart from the fact that it's a long series which seems to self confess to providing not much value and therefore not rating itself high on the review list? So if I get the gist, the only real value is removing a pair of get/put calls in the critical path, so produce a single patch doing that and it will all go a lot faster than having to review seven code movement and pointless rename patches. James > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:05:45PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > This patch series consists of four patches that address device > > removal issues and three patches that improve performance of the > > SCSI mid-layer. > > > > The individual patches are. > > 0001-Introduce-scsi_device_being_removed.patch > > 0002-Rework-scsi_internal_device_unblock.patch > > 0003-Avoid-re-enabling-I-O-after-the-transport-became-off.patch > > 0004-Disallow-changing-the-device-state-via-sysfs-into-de.patch > > 0005-Micro-optimize-scsi_request_fn.patch > > 0006-Rename-scsi_get_command-and-scsi_put_command.patch > > 0007-Micro-optimize-scsi_next_command.patch > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ---end quoted text--- > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
