On 09/02/13 09:12, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
@@ -353,6 +354,8 @@ void scsi_put_command(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
list_del_init(&cmd->list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmd->device->list_lock, flags);
+ cancel_delayed_work(&cmd->abort_work);
+
__scsi_put_command(cmd->device->host, cmd, &sdev->sdev_gendev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_put_command);
Is this approach safe ? Is it e.g. possible that the abort work starts
just before the cancel_delayed_work() call and continues to run after
scsi_put_command() has finished ? In drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c a
similar issue is solved by holding an additional reference as long as
delayed work (fc_exch.timeout_work) is queued.
+void
+scmd_eh_abort_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct scsi_cmnd *scmd =
+ container_of(work, struct scsi_cmnd, abort_work.work);
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = scmd->device;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int rtn;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(sdev->host->host_lock, flags);
+ if (scsi_host_eh_past_deadline(sdev->host)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(sdev->host->host_lock, flags);
+ SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
+ scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
+ "scmd %p eh timeout, not aborting\n", scmd));
+ } else {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(sdev->host->host_lock, flags);
+ SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
+ scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
+ "aborting command %p\n", scmd));
+ rtn = scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(sdev->host->hostt, scmd);
+ if (rtn == SUCCESS) {
+ scmd->result |= DID_TIME_OUT << 16;
+ if (!scsi_noretry_cmd(scmd) &&
+ (++scmd->retries <= scmd->allowed)) {
+ SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
+ scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
+ "scmd %p retry "
+ "aborted command\n", scmd));
+ scsi_queue_insert(scmd, SCSI_MLQUEUE_EH_RETRY);
+ } else {
+ SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
+ scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
+ "scmd %p finish "
+ "aborted command\n", scmd));
+ scsi_finish_command(scmd);
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+ SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
+ scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
+ "scmd %p abort failed, rtn %d\n",
+ scmd, rtn));
+ }
+
+ if (scsi_eh_scmd_add(scmd, 0)) {
+ SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
+ scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
+ "scmd %p terminate "
+ "aborted command\n", scmd));
+ scmd->result |= DID_TIME_OUT << 16;
+ scsi_finish_command(scmd);
+ }
+}
This patch adds several new calls to LLD EH handlers. Is it guaranteed
that these will only be invoked before scsi_remove_host() has finished ?
For more background information, see also "[PATCH] Make
scsi_remove_host() wait until error handling finished"
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/82572/focus=82779).
Thanks,
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
