On 08/26/2013 06:14 AM, 黃清隆 wrote:
> From: Ching <ching2048@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Support Areca new SATA Raid adapter ARC1214/1224/1264/1284.
> Modify maximum outstanding command number, notify command complete with auto
> request sense
> Signed-off-by: Ching <ching2048@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Ching,
+static bool
+arcmsr_hbaD_get_config(struct AdapterControlBlock *acb)
+{
...
+ dma_coherent = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev, acb->uncache_size,
+ &dma_coherent_handle, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dma_coherent) {
+ pr_notice("DMA allocation failed...\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
You've declared the return value as a bool so the function should return false or true.
---------------------------------------
In arcmsr_alloc_ccb_pool
- roundup_ccbsize = roundup(sizeof(struct CommandControlBlock) + (max_sg_entrys - 1) * sizeof(struct SG64ENTRY), 32);
- acb->uncache_size = roundup_ccbsize * ARCMSR_MAX_FREECCB_NUM;
- dma_coherent = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev, acb->uncache_size, &dma_coherent_handle, GFP_KERNEL);
- if(!dma_coherent){
- printk(KERN_NOTICE "arcmsr%d: dma_alloc_coherent got error\n", acb->host->host_no);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ switch (acb->adapter_type) {
+ case ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_A: {
+ roundup_ccbsize =
+ roundup(sizeof(struct CommandControlBlock) +
+ max_sg_entrys * sizeof(struct SG64ENTRY), 32);
+ acb->uncache_size = roundup_ccbsize *
+ ARCMSR_MAX_FREECCB_NUM;
+ dma_coherent = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev,
+ acb->uncache_size, &dma_coherent_handle,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
...
+ case ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B: {
+ roundup_ccbsize = roundup(sizeof(struct CommandControlBlock) +
+ (max_sg_entrys - 1) * sizeof(struct SG64ENTRY), 32);
+ acb->uncache_size = roundup_ccbsize *
+ ARCMSR_MAX_FREECCB_NUM;
+ dma_coherent = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev,
+ acb->uncache_size, &dma_coherent_handle,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
You've added a switch with four almost identical
cases, what is the point of splitting the code this way?
-----------------------------------------
struct AdapterControlBlock
+ void *dma_coherent;
+ dma_addr_t dma_coherent_handle;
+ dma_addr_t dma_coherent_handle2;
+ void *dma_coherent2;
why do you need these pairs? Is there an adapter which uses both
for example dma_coherent and dma_coherent2 at the same time?
Please include the patch into the message body next time, it makes the review easier.
Thanks, Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
