Re: [PATCH 9/9] tcm_qla2xxx: Add special case for COMPARE_AND_WRITE data_direction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't understand this.  In fact the whole patch series looks quite
> confused.  COMPARE AND WRITE is a normal Data-Out command, with no
> requirement for special bidirectional handling or anything like that.
> The only slightly unusual thing is that a CAW command with a NUMBER OF
> LOGICAL BLOCKS equal to N will actually transfer 2*N worth of data --
> one set of data for the compare operation and a second set to write if
> the compare succeeds.  But just to be clear, the transfer of those 2*N
> blocks happens as a single transfer during the Data-Out phase.

OK, I understand the patch set a bit better.  You're using the bidi
infrastructure to have a place to stick the data that you internally
read to implement the compare, but then you end up having places like
this where you have to say, "oh it's not really a bidi command, it's
just a compare and write."

Shouldn't there be a way to confine the COMPARE AND WRITE handling to
the actual implementation of that command?  Or maybe make the bidi
handling more generic so that this becomes clearer?

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux