Re: [PATCH 1/3] hpsa: remove unneeded loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> From: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock, 
>> we don't need the test_and_set_bit, set_bit is enough and the loop
>> can be removed too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 15 ++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
>> index 796482b..d7df01e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
>> @@ -2662,15 +2662,12 @@ static struct CommandList *cmd_alloc(struct ctlr_info *h)
>>  	unsigned long flags;
>>  
>>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&h->lock, flags);
>> -	do {
>> -		i = find_first_zero_bit(h->cmd_pool_bits, h->nr_cmds);
>> -		if (i == h->nr_cmds) {
>> -			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&h->lock, flags);
>> -			return NULL;
>> -		}
>> -	} while (test_and_set_bit
>> -		 (i & (BITS_PER_LONG - 1),
>> -		  h->cmd_pool_bits + (i / BITS_PER_LONG)) != 0);
>> +	i = find_first_zero_bit(h->cmd_pool_bits, h->nr_cmds);
>> +	if (i == h->nr_cmds) {
>> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&h->lock, flags);
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +	set_bit(i & (BITS_PER_LONG - 1), h->cmd_pool_bits + (i / BITS_PER_LONG));
>>  	h->nr_allocs++;
>>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&h->lock, flags);
>>  
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
> Would it be better instead to just not use the spinlock for protecting
> cmd_pool_bits?  I have thought about doing this for awhile, but haven't
> gotten around to it.
>
> I think the while loop is safe without the spin lock.  And then it is
> not needed in cmd_free either.

I was evaluating the same idea for a while too, a loop and inside just the test_and_set_bit,
maybe even a stored value to start with a likely empty bit from last time to tune it a bit.
But I know almost nothing about the use pattern, so I decided for the least invasive change
to the existing code, to not make it worse.


>
> -- steve
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux