Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] AHCI: Optimize interrupt processing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 07:50 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Yo,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:43:13PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Considering there can be more than a single ata_device hanging off each
> > ata_port, the '*sdev = ap->link.device[0].sdev' in __ata_qc_from_tag()
> > is definitely bogus, but I'm not sure how else to correlate
> > blk-mq/scsi-mq per device descriptors to existing code expecting
> > ata_port->qcmd[] descriptors to be shared across multiple devices..
> > 
> > Tejun..?
> 
> I have no idea.  Let's please just do simpler conversion and worry
> about embedding qc's into scsi_cmnds later.  libata isn't a normal
> SCSI driver and has a rather its own thick midlayer doing the
> impedance matching inbetween && I really don't think there is too much
> benefit to be reaped from embedding qc's into scsi_cmnds.
> 

That is essentially the same conclusion that I came to, but wanted to at
least give you a chance to comment here.  ;)

So that said, I'll include a simple conversion for libata into the
scsi-mq WIP branch, and folks who are interested in more detailed
conversions can pursue them as separate items.

--nab 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux