> @@ -646,14 +703,20 @@ static int scsi_try_target_reset(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> static int scsi_try_bus_device_reset(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> {
> int rtn;
> - struct scsi_host_template *hostt = scmd->device->host->hostt;
> + struct Scsi_Host *host = scmd->device->host;
> + struct scsi_host_template *hostt = host->hostt;
>
> if (!hostt->eh_device_reset_handler)
> return FAILED;
>
> + if (scsi_begin_eh(host))
> + return FAST_IO_FAIL;
> +
> rtn = hostt->eh_device_reset_handler(scmd);
> if (rtn == SUCCESS)
> __scsi_report_device_reset(scmd->device, NULL);
> + scsi_end_eh(host);
> +
> return rtn;
> }
As the new eh from Hannes haven't make it into mainline, maybe we still
need also check scsi_try_to_abort_cmd?
Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
