Re: [PATCH 0/10] qla2xxx: Reduce the number of Coverity warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bart,
Thanks for patchset. There are minor issue with some patches like updating
the missing msg_ids in qla_dbg.c file. I am replying to each of the patch.

Thanks,
~Saurav


>On 06/07/13 21:06, Saurav Kashyap wrote:
>> Thanks for the patches. Please share the warnings reported by Coverity,
>>so
>> that its easy for us to review the patches.
>
>Hello Saurav,
>
>The Coverity warnings that led me to developing this patch series are as
>follows:
>- For patches 1, 2, 3, 8: Logically dead code - execution cannot reach
>this statement.
>- For patch 4: Array compared against 0 (NO_EFFECT) array_null:
>Comparing an array to null is not useful: "ha->model_desc".
>- For patch 5, 6 and 9: Unused pointer value.
>- For patch 7: Overrunning struct type ct_sns_req of 1228 bytes by
>passing it to a function which accesses it at byte offset 8207.
>- For patch 10: Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK) leaked_storage: Variable
>"fcport" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
>
>Hope this helps,
>
>Bart.
>

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux