Re: [PATCH 3/9] scsi: improved eh timeout handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 10 June 2013 11:19:16 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> 
> I don't care too much whether we use per-command work items or a
> single system-global thread.

Actually, I do care.  We have to abort the commands in parallel, as a
fairly large number of abort can queue up and individual aborts can
take 20s on hardware I care about.

20s for an abort is pretty bad, but given today's reality there is no
need to make things worse by serializing.

Jörn

--
A defeated army first battles and then seeks victory.
-- Sun Tzu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux