Re: [PATCH 3/4] scsi: improved eh timeout handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 6 June 2013 22:39:14 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> 
> >>+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->list_lock, flags);
> >>+		SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
> >>+			scmd_printk(KERN_INFO, scmd,
> >>+				    "aborting command %p\n", scmd));
> >>+		rtn = scsi_try_to_abort_cmd(shost->hostt, scmd);
> >>+		if (rtn == SUCCESS || rtn == FAST_IO_FAIL) {
> >>+			if (((scmd->request->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_DEV) ||
> >
> >Am I being stupid again or should this be negated?
> >
> Knowing you I would think the former; where do you see the negation?

If REQ_FAILFAST_DEV is set, this runs scsi_queue_insert(), which I
would expect it should run scsi_finish_command().

> >>+			     (scmd->request->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC)) &&
> >>+			    (++scmd->retries <= scmd->allowed)) {
> >>+				SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
> >>+					scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
> >>+						    "retry aborted command\n"));
> >>+
> >>+				scsi_queue_insert(scmd, SCSI_MLQUEUE_EH_RETRY);
> >>+			} else {
> >>+				SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
> >>+					scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
> >>+						    "fast fail aborted command\n"));
> >>+				scmd->result |= DID_TRANSPORT_FAILFAST << 16;
> >>+				scsi_finish_command(scmd);
> >>+			}
> >>+		} else {
> >>+			if (!scsi_eh_scmd_add(scmd, 0)) {
> >>+				SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3,
> >>+					scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
> >>+						    "terminate aborted command\n"));
> >>+				scmd->result |= DID_TIME_OUT << 16;
> >>+				scsi_finish_command(scmd);
> >>+			}
> >>+		}
> >>+		spin_lock_irqsave(&sdev->list_lock, flags);
> >>+	}
> >>+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->list_lock, flags);
...
> >>@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ static struct scsi_device *scsi_alloc_sdev(struct scsi_target *starget,
> >>  	struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent);
> >>  	extern void scsi_evt_thread(struct work_struct *work);
> >>  	extern void scsi_requeue_run_queue(struct work_struct *work);
> >>+	extern void scsi_eh_abort_handler(struct work_struct *work);
> >
> >Function declarations in a .c file?  Ick!
> >
> Sing-along: We didn't start the fire, it always burning ...
> 
> I'm just following precedents here.

Fair enough.

Jörn

--
The cost of changing business rules is much more expensive for software
than for a secretary.
-- unknown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux