On 5/30/13 12:50 AM, "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>There is an unlock missing if the == FNIC_IOREQ_ABTS_PENDING is
>false.
>
>Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>---
>Static analysis. I can't test this.
>
>diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
>index be99e75..a97e6e5 100644
>--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
>+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
>@@ -2432,11 +2432,9 @@ int fnic_is_abts_pending(struct fnic *fnic, struct
>scsi_cmnd *lr_sc)
> "Found IO in %s on lun\n",
> fnic_ioreq_state_to_str(CMD_STATE(sc)));
>
>- if (CMD_STATE(sc) == FNIC_IOREQ_ABTS_PENDING) {
>- spin_unlock_irqrestore(io_lock, flags);
>+ if (CMD_STATE(sc) == FNIC_IOREQ_ABTS_PENDING)
> ret = 1;
>- continue;
>- }
>+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(io_lock, flags);
> }
>
> return ret;
Tested-by: Hiral Patel <hiralpat@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Hiral Patel <hiralpat@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
