On 05/30/2013 04:32 AM, Libo Chen wrote:
> On 2013/5/30 9:38, Libo Chen wrote:
>> On 2013/5/29 23:03, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>>> On 05/24/2013 11:40 AM, Libo Chen wrote:
>>>> we should check kzalloc, avoid to hit oops
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Libo Chen <libo.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/scsi/megaraid.c | 4 ++++
>>>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> instead of checking scmd->device, sdev is more appropriate.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>>> index 846f475..6b623cb 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>>>> @@ -4161,6 +4161,10 @@ mega_internal_command(adapter_t *adapter, megacmd_t *mc, mega_passthru *pthru)
>>>> memset(scb, 0, sizeof(scb_t));
>>>>
>>>> sdev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct scsi_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (sdev) {
>>>> + scsi_free_command(GFP_KERNEL, scmd);
>>> I think, that a mutex_unlock(&adapter->int_mtx); is also needed
>>> Maybe just setting a rval = -ENOMEM and a jump to to some point below?
>>>
>>> tomash
>> thanks for catching this.
>>
>> when kzalloc broken, fist unlock and then return. I will update later.
>>
> I think we can put kzalloc outside of mutex_lock(&adapter->int_mtx) ?
> phase:
Yes, that is also possible, depends on what you prefer.
>
> mutex_lock kzalloc
> kzalloc -> mutex_lock
>
>
>> Libo
>>
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + }
>>>> scmd->device = sdev;
>>>>
>>>> memset(adapter->int_cdb, 0, sizeof(adapter->int_cdb));
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
