Yes, apparently I have, and I missed this mail as well until it was brought to my attention earlier. I apologise for re sending the patch series with mistakes, I withdraw it and let Santosh send it as he see fit. > On Monday, May 13, 2013, Dolev Raviv wrote: >> This patch series clusters the latest version of all the UFS patches in >> the >> SCSI mailing list. It gives a stable functional base line for the UFS >> driver. >> >> It includes the following versions: >> > [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: devicetree: Add DT bindings for UFS host >> > controller >> > [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Fix the response UPIU length setting >> > [PATCH v4 1/6] scsi: ufs: wrap the i/o access operations >> > [PATCH v4 2/6] scsi: ufs: amend interrupt configuration >> > [PATCH v4 3/6] scsi: ufs: fix interrupt status clears >> > [PATCH v4 4/6] scsi: ufs: rework link start-up process >> > [PATCH V5 1/1] scsi: ufs: Add support for sending NOP OUT UPIU >> > [PATCH V4] scsi: ufs: Set fDeviceInit flag to initiate device >> > initialization >> >> But does not include: >> > [PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: ufs: add dme configuration primit >> > [PATCH v4 6/6] scsi: ufs: add dme control primitives >> >> >> Dolev Raviv (8): >> Documentation: devicetree: Add DT bindings for UFS host controller >> scsi: ufs: Fix the response UPIU length setting >> scsi: ufs: wrap the i/o access operations >> scsi: ufs: amend interrupt configuration >> scsi: ufs: fix interrupt status clears >> scsi: ufs: rework link start-up process >> scsi: ufs: Add support for sending NOP OUT UPIU >> scsi: ufs: Set fDeviceInit flag to initiate device initialization > > It seems that you missed my first comment on previous mailing. > > RE: [PATCH V1 3/8] scsi: ufs: wrap the i/o access operations > Could you check the e-mail? > > If you intended to sort the patches instead of Santosh, > you should have identify the author per patch e-mail expect 8/8 which is > from you. > 'From: Author name <Author e-mail>' is expected in the head of e-mail. > I feel that maintainer has this role, though. > > And there is need to check the base of tree for ufshcd. > ' scsi: ufs: add support for query requests' is not merged finally. > I think we can talk with Santosh for those. > > Thanks, > Seungwon Jeon > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
