On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 17:29 +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Introduce msgbyte and statusbyte in the prints as part of the
> result which is returned by the lower layer driver in response to
> SCSI command issued, in case of any error conditions.
>
> Purpose of adding these prints is to convey, during any I/O
> error case, which condition exactly has happened in lower device and
> from the prints we can directly deduce, what is the status of command
> issued. This will help to quickly debug the scenario and also making
> a test case to create new scenarios.
>
> Also change the printk to more appropriate pr_* macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/constants.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/constants.c b/drivers/scsi/constants.c
> index 76e4c03..77bb1dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/constants.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/constants.c
> @@ -1445,8 +1445,10 @@ void scsi_show_result(int result)
>
> void scsi_show_result(int result)
> {
> - printk("Result: hostbyte=0x%02x driverbyte=0x%02x\n",
> - host_byte(result), driver_byte(result));
> + pr_info("Result: hostbyte=0x%02x driverbyte=0x%02x"
> + "msgbyte=0x%02x statusbyte=0x%02x\n",
> + host_byte(result), driver_byte(result), msg_byte(result),
> + status_byte(result));
You didn't test this, did you? If you did, you'd have noticed the change
from printk to pr_info gives you an unwanted "6" in the message.
Also, what are you hoping to achieve? scsi_show_result() is only used by
sd in a very few special command situations. I can't believe the msg
byte would be anything other than zero and the status byte check
condition.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
