Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: Avoid invoking blk_run_queue() recursively

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/22/13 20:01, Jens Axboe wrote:
That'd be fine. I agree with Tejun that just returning is error prone
and could cause hard-to-debug hangs or stalls. So something ala

         if (blk_queue(dead))
                 return;
         else if (q->request_fn_active) {
                 blk_delay_queue(q, 0);
                 return;
         }

would work. Alternatively, you could mark the queue as needing a re-run,
so any existing runner of it would notice and clear this flag and re-run
the queue. But that's somewhat more fragile, and since it isn't a
hot/performance path, I suspect the simple "just re-run me soon" is good
enough.

I'm worried that in the device mapper the approach using blk_delay_queue() could trigger a queue run after the final dm_put(). And I'm also afraid that that approach could trigger several needless context switches before q->request_fn_active finally drops to zero. So the approach with the "need re-run" flag seems preferable to me. But maybe I'm overlooking something ?

Bart.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux