Re: [PATCH] Use a more selective error recovery strategy based on device capabilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/14/2013 09:57 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
On 2/13/2013 8:43 PM, Michael Christie wrote:
For the case where report supported TMFs is not supported can we just have the
>> LLD return some new return code from the eh callback when it gets FUNCTION_REJECTED. >> scsi-ml would then clear the eh_*_ok bit, so at least it would not be called again..


	Hmm, that seems like a good idea. The question is, does propagating the flag
change to all the devices on the I_T make sense?

Hmm. Again, I've yet to find a storage array which actually _does_ reject a TMF. None of mine do, not even the latest and greatest NetApp Ontap version ...

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux