On 12/7/2012 1:58 PM, Chad Dupuis wrote: > Also, are there certain port types we wouldn't want to send this reset to > such as tape? AFAIK, for tape it shouldn't cause any more harm than the target reset which happens immediately before it. This patch is infinitely better than the previous "bus" reset behavior. That said, its far from perfect. The code (as I understand it) isn't differentiating between isolating the failure, or bringing out the big hammer in an attempt to correct problems on a specific I_T_L. If you drop/reset the I_T because one of the LUN's is misbehaving before verifying the status of other LUN's on the target, you risk interrupting operations to functional devices. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
