On 12/03/2012 11:23 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, James.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 08:25:43AM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
index e65c62e..1756151 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ struct scsi_device {
unsigned can_power_off:1; /* Device supports runtime power off */
unsigned wce_default_on:1; /* Cache is ON by default */
unsigned no_dif:1; /* T10 PI (DIF) should be disabled */
+ unsigned event_driven:1; /* No need to poll the device */
DECLARE_BITMAP(supported_events, SDEV_EVT_MAXBITS); /* supported events */
struct list_head event_list; /* asserted events */
Yes, but if we can get away with doing that, it should be in genhd
because it's completely generic.
I was imagining we'd have to fake the reply to the test unit ready or
some other commands, which is why it would need to be in sr.c
The check events code is Tejun's baby, if he's OK with it then just do
it in genhd.c
The problem here is there's no easy to reach genhd from libata (or the
other way around) without going through sr. I think we're gonna have
to have something in sr one way or the other.
...which is precisely as I said when v1 of this ZPODD patchset appeared.
sr modifications cannot be avoided.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
