On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 23:15 +0400, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 10:50 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > > - I think the srp_transport stuff should go through linux-scsi / > > James B. > > instead of my tree, esp. since it's shared with the IBM vscsi stuff > > (I think) > > - I see Bart had a few comments about a few of your patches, I'll > > wait > > for you guys to hash that out. > > I'm amenable to that, but we do need an agreed patch set, as Roland > says. I also hate to apply the pressure, but I suspect -rc7 was the > last -rc, so I'm expecting the merge window to open on 2/12. We can push it through James's tree if need be, but Bart's code is pretty self-contained, and going through the SCSI tree will introduce merge dependencies. It'd be much easier to push it all through the RDMA tree, especially if we want to get this landed for 3.8. I'd want Fujita Tomonori, Robert Jennings, and James to ack the changes the SRP transport code, though they've been pending for a long time w/o comment so perhaps silence is consent? -- Dave Dillow National Center for Computational Science Oak Ridge National Laboratory (865) 241-6602 office -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
