Hi James, On Friday, November 09, 2012 03:27:50 PM Aaron Lu wrote: > This patchset has been quiet for a while, so resend them. > > v4: > Only Patch 4 is modified: > Fixed a line over 80 characters warning by checkpatch.pl; > Update the changelog so that it is no more a try :-) > > v3: > Only patch 4 is modified: > Remove the special case for system freeze in scsi_bus_suspend_common > as pointed out by Alan Stern; > Updated some comments; > Removed the use of typedef (*pm_callback_t)(struct device *). > > v2: > Change the runtime suspend behaviour of sd driver by putting the device > into stopped power state. > Revert 2 patches which are no longer needed as pointed out by Alan Stern. > Find out device callbacks in bus callbacks as suggested by Alan Stern. > > Due to these changes, patch number grows from 2 -> 5. > > v1: > The 2 patches will migrate SCSI drivers to use the pm callbacks defined > in dev_pm_ops as pm_message is deprecated and should not be used by driver. > Bus level callback is changed to use callbacks defined in dev_pm_ops when > needed and sd's pm callback is updated to use what are defined in dev_pm_ops. > > > Aaron Lu (5): > sd: put to stopped power state when runtime suspend > Revert "[SCSI] scsi_pm: set device runtime state before parent > suspended" > Revert "[SCSI] runtime resume parent for child's system-resume" > pm: use callbacks from dev_pm_ops for scsi devices > sd: update sd to use the new pm callbacks > > drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > drivers/scsi/sd.c | 18 +++++++--- > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) Do you have any plans with respect to this patchset? It has been acked by Alan and me, do you have any objections against it? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
