Re: [PATCH-v2 2/3] target: Add/check max_write_same_len device attribute + update block limits VPD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 20:13 +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This patch adds a new max_write_same_len device attribute for use with
> WRITE_SAME w/ UNMAP=0 backend emulation.  This can be useful for
> lowering the default backend value (IBLOCK uses 0xFFFF).
> 
> Also, update block limits VPD emulation code in spc_emulate_evpd_b0() to
> report MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH, and enforce max_write_same_len during
> sbc_parse() -> sbc_setup_write_same() CDB sanity checking for all emulated
> WRITE_SAME w/ UNMAP=0 cases.
> 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c |    4 ++++
>  drivers/target/target_core_device.c   |   11 +++++++++++
>  drivers/target/target_core_internal.h |    1 +
>  drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c      |    8 ++++++++
>  drivers/target/target_core_spc.c      |    8 +++++++-
>  include/target/target_core_base.h     |    3 +++
>  6 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 

<SNIP>

> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
> index a5a8f46..8dd8a802 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_sbc.c
> @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ static inline unsigned long long transport_lba_64_ext(unsigned char *cdb)
>  static sense_reason_t
>  sbc_setup_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *flags, struct sbc_ops *ops)
>  {
> +	unsigned int sectors = spc_get_write_same_sectors(cmd);
> +
>  	if ((flags[0] & 0x04) || (flags[0] & 0x02)) {
>  		pr_err("WRITE_SAME PBDATA and LBDATA"
>  			" bits not supported for Block Discard"
> @@ -258,6 +260,12 @@ sbc_setup_write_same(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *flags, struct sbc_ops *o
>  	if (!ops->execute_write_same)
>  		return TCM_UNSUPPORTED_SCSI_OPCODE;
>  
> +	if (sectors > cmd->se_dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len) {
> +		pr_warn("WRITE_SAME sectors: %u exceeds max_write_same_len: %u\n",
> +			sectors, cmd->se_dev->dev_attrib.max_write_same_len);
> +		return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD;
> +	}
> +
>  	cmd->execute_cmd = ops->execute_write_same;
>  	return 0;
>  }

Now moving the max_write_same_len check above directly ahead of the
UNMAP conditional branch, so that both WRITE_SAME w/ UNMAP=[1,0] are
properly checked against this value as per hch's + Robert's input.

Thanks!

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux