Re: [PATCH] USB enclosures seem to require read(16) with >2TB drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 12/11/2012 12:33, James Bottomley ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 11:08 -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>> b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>> index 13b8bcd..6ff785e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c
>> @@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device
>> *sdev)
>>                                         US_FL_SCM_MULT_TARG)) &&
>>                                 us->protocol == USB_PR_BULK)
>>                         us->use_last_sector_hacks = 1;
>> +
>> +               /* Force read-16 for large capacity drives. */
>> +               sdev->force_read_16 = 1;
>> +
>> +
> 
> This turns READ_16 on unconditionally for all USB disks ... is that
> safe?  As in have you tested this with older USB thumb drives?

Actually it only turns it on for large capacity drives, as said in the
comment.  sdp->force_read_16 only matters for >2TB drives: 
 
>> +	/* Many large capacity USB drives/controllers require the use of read(16). */
>> +	force_read16 = (sdkp->capacity > 0xffffffffULL && sdp->force_read_16);
>> +
>>  	if (host_dif == SD_DIF_TYPE2_PROTECTION) {
>>  		SCpnt->cmnd = mempool_alloc(sd_cdb_pool, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>  
>> @@ -833,7 +836,7 @@ static int sd_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>>  		SCpnt->cmnd[29] = (unsigned char) (this_count >> 16) & 0xff;
>>  		SCpnt->cmnd[30] = (unsigned char) (this_count >> 8) & 0xff;
>>  		SCpnt->cmnd[31] = (unsigned char) this_count & 0xff;
>> -	} else if (block > 0xffffffff) {
>> +	} else if (block > 0xffffffff || force_read16) {

so the better name would be never_use_10_for_rw_on_large_disks.  For
some definitions of better. :)

Any reason not to do this always on >2TB drives, which basically means
changing this:

-	} else if (block > 0xffffffff) {
+	} else if (sdkp->capacity > 0xffffffff) {

and nothing else?

Paolo

> 
>> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
>> index 5591ed5..e92b846 100644
>> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
>> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
>> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct scsi_device {
>>                                      * because we did a bus reset. */
>>         unsigned use_10_for_rw:1; /* first try 10-byte read / write */
>>         unsigned use_10_for_ms:1; /* first try 10-byte mode
>> sense/select */
>> +       unsigned force_read_16:1; /* Use read(16) over read(10) */
> 
> This should probably be use_16_for_rw:1 for consistency.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux