> > 1. Yes, I've got first hand proof of a GPL violation (in which case > > we'll then move to seeing how we can remedy this) or > > 2. A genuine public apology for the libel, which I'll do my best to > > prevail on RTS to accept. > > > > Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of this > > nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction. > > That asks for moderation until we have a better investigation of the > facts. It definitely doesn't try to prejudge them or express preference > for a specific outcome as your misquote makes out. So how can you demand a public apology for libel or instant first hand proof and now claim you just wanted moderation ? It's not hard to see why your position was misinterpreted ? Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
