Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> writes:
> On 11/02/12 22:45, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
>> index 593085a..7d7ad8b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
>> @@ -336,16 +336,25 @@ static struct device_type scsi_host_type = {
>> **/
>> struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize)
>> {
>> + return scsi_host_alloc_node(sht, privsize, -1);
>
> Using NUMA_NO_NODE here might improve readability.
Agreed, I'll fix that.
>> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
>> index 4908480..a1b5c8e 100644
>> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
>> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
>> @@ -733,6 +733,12 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
>> struct device *dma_dev;
>>
>> /*
>> + * Numa node this device is closest to, used for allocating
>> + * data structures locally.
>> + */
>> + int numa_node;
>
> Have you considered using #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA / #endif here ? I've
> noticed that all other numa_node members in structures under include/
> have this.
That was an oversight, thanks for pointing it out. I'll fix it up.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
