Re: [PATCH v8 09/11] block: add a new interface to block events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 03:04:17PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > check_event() can retry.  Just add a per-sr mutex which is try-locked
> > by sr_block_check_events() and grab it when entering zero power.
> 
> Good suggestion. I didn't think about solving it this way.
> 
> Many people suggest me that ZPODD is pure SATA/ACPI stuff, and should
> not pollute sr driver, so I was trying hard not to touch sr while
> preparing these patches, unless there is no other choice(like the
> blocking event interface).
> 
> So I'm not sure if your suggestion is the way to go.
> 
> James, what do you think? Is it OK if I add a mutex into the scsi_cd
> structure to do this? Of course I'll define this only under
> CONFIG_SATA_ZPODD.

I don't think what James' and my suggestions are that different.  Just
silence check_event() while zpodd is kicked in somehow.  There's no
reason to synchronize across multiple subsystems.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux