Hello, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:09:04PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Some request_fn implementations, e.g. scsi_request_fn(), unlock > the queue lock. Make sure that blk_cleanup_queue() waits until all > active request_fn invocations have finished. This fixes a potential > use-after-free at the end of scsi_request_fn(). Also, change the > type of the 'drain' variable from bool to int to avoid that the > highest bits of the request counters get ignored. Similar comment. It would be great if you better separate what's broken and how it's fixed. Kinda difficult to digest. > @@ -308,7 +308,9 @@ void __blk_run_queue_uncond(struct request_queue *q) > if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q))) > return; > > + q->driver_active++; > q->request_fn(q); > + q->driver_active--; Maybe q->request_fn_active is a better name? > -void blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all) > +static void blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all) > { > int i; > > while (true) { > - bool drain = false; > + int drain = 0; I don't think this is necessary. bool conversion works fine regardless how high the bits are. Isn't avoiding signed/unsigned autocast maze one of the reasons why we're using bool to begin with? > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > index f29a1a9..0e15374 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > @@ -1517,10 +1517,6 @@ static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queue *q) > struct scsi_cmnd *cmd; > struct request *req; > > - if(!get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev)) > - /* We must be tearing the block queue down already */ > - return; > - > /* > * To start with, we keep looping until the queue is empty, or until > * the host is no longer able to accept any more requests. > @@ -1629,11 +1625,7 @@ out_delay: > if (sdev->device_busy == 0) > blk_delay_queue(q, SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY); > out: > - /* must be careful here...if we trigger the ->remove() function > - * we cannot be holding the q lock */ > - spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock); > - put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev); > - spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); > + ; I think moving this out to a separate patch would be better. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html