On 09/30/2012 03:43 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Jeff Garzik wrote:
The simple fact of "only ZPODD devices out there are ATA" is not the
decision-maker for where the code should live. It is more a question
where ZPODD belongs in the device/command set model currently employed.
I don't really accept this argument. It's a little like saying: The
tty layer uses ioctl commands to control RS232 line settings; therefore
RS232 settings should be handled in the VFS layer as part of the ioctl
core.
Hardly -- sr is an optical device driver, much more aligned.
And libata is probably at least 50% of the entire sr userbase, if not
much much more.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
