On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 22:20 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > James> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:00 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> > >> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 4 ++++ drivers/scsi/sd.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, > >> 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > James> I'm not opposed in principle to doing this (except that it should > James> be a sysfs parameter like all our other controls), > > Now that we're in that department. I never got any feedback on the > following patch. > > Hannes told me in person that he felt the eh_timeout belonged in > scsi_device and not in the request queue. Whereas I favored making it a > block layer tunable despite currently only being used by SCSI. Any > opinions? request_queue makes more sense to me because there was once a plan to move all our timeout processing to block. I think it got stalled somewhere, but this would act as a reminder. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
