Re: [usb-storage] Re: usb3 fails to write when using usb3 hub in usb3 port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>
>> Alan, I'm wondering if the xHCI ring expansion is causing issues with
>> USB hard drives under xHCI.  Testing with a Buffalo USB 3.0 hard drive
>> with an NEC uPD720200 xHCI host, I see that the usb-storage and SCSI
>> initialization produces I/O errors on random sectors in 3.4.0, 3.4.6,
>> and 3.5.0.  I can't get those errors to be reproduced in 3.3.1.
>>
>> The xHCI ring expansion was added in 3.4, and we changed the xHCI's
>> sg_tablesize:
>>
>> int xhci_gen_setup(struct usb_hcd *hcd, xhci_get_quirks_t get_quirks)
>> {
>> ...
>>         /* Accept arbitrarily long scatter-gather lists */
>>         hcd->self.sg_tablesize = ~0;
>>
>> The usb-storage driver sets the tablesize thus:
>>
>> static unsigned int usb_stor_sg_tablesize(struct usb_interface *intf)
>> {
>>         struct usb_device *usb_dev = interface_to_usbdev(intf);
>>
>>         if (usb_dev->bus->sg_tablesize) {
>>                 return usb_dev->bus->sg_tablesize;
>>         }
>>         return SG_ALL;
>> }
>>
>> I notice that SG_ALL is set to SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS, which is only 128.
>> Should we be passing an arbitrarily large number to the SCSI core?
>
> Yes, there's no reason not to.  The block layer will make sure that
> each individual request has a sufficiently small number of segments.
>
>> There's some wording in include/scsi/scsi.h about also limiting the
>> number of chained sgs to 2048.  I'm wondering if we're hitting some bugs
>> in the SCSI layer because we're setting the sg_tablesize so high.
>
> I doubt it.  Anyway, this stuff is handled by the block layer now, not
> the SCSI layer.  If you look through drivers/scsi, you'll see that
> SG_ALL is used only in various SCSI interface drivers, not in the core.
>
>> Alternately, we could be hitting bugs in the USB 3.0 firmware when we
>> attempt to issue a read or write that's too big.  The read on Adrian's
>> hard drive failed on a bigger read request (122880 bytes).  It would be
>> interesting to see if it works fine if the xHCI sg_tablesize is limited.
>> I'm going to try that with my own drive on 3.5.4 and see if it helps.
>
> There were examples in the earlier usbmon traces where 122880-byte
> reads succeeded, for whatever that's worth...
>
> I doubt very much that you are anywhere close to hitting that limit.
> If a 120-KB transfer has more than 128 SG segments then on average each
> segment would be under 1024 bytes, a lot smaller than a page, which
> seems unlikely.  I don't think I've ever seen a transfer needing more
> than about 8 segments.
>
> Alan Stern
>
Ok, back to vanilla 3.4.11, disabled CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD_DEBUGGING ..

I still see

2012-09-26T19:52:16.661604+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1213.416759] usb
3-2.4: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 11 using xhci_hcd
2012-09-26T19:52:16.674632+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1213.429351]
xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: xHCI xhci_drop_endpoint called with disabled ep
ffff88011d3c6980
2012-09-26T19:52:16.674665+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1213.429363]
xhci_hcd 0000:04:00.0: xHCI xhci_drop_endpoint called with disabled ep
ffff88011d3c69c0
T:  Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#=  8 Spd=5000 MxCh= 4
D:  Ver= 3.00 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=03 MxPS= 9 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=2109 ProdID=0810 Rev= 3.74
S:  Manufacturer=VIA Labs, Inc.
S:  Product=4-Port USB 3.0 Hub
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=  2mA
I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=13(Int.) MxPS=   2 Ivl=4096ms

T:  Bus=02 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#=  4 Spd=480  MxCh= 4
D:  Ver= 2.00 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=2109 ProdID=3431 Rev= 2.74
S:  Product=USB2.0 Hub
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=e0 MxPwr=100mA
I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=09(hub  ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=hub
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=   1 Ivl=256ms

T:  Bus=03 Lev=02 Prnt=08 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  9 Spd=5000 MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 3.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 9 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=1058 ProdID=1140 Rev=10.03
S:  Manufacturer=Western Digital
S:  Product=My Book 1140
S:  SerialNumber=5743415A4144303235323133
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=  2mA
I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=usb-storage
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms
E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms

T:  Bus=03 Lev=02 Prnt=08 Port=03 Cnt=04 Dev#= 11 Spd=5000 MxCh= 0
D:  Ver= 3.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 9 #Cfgs=  1
P:  Vendor=1058 ProdID=1140 Rev=10.03
S:  Manufacturer=Western Digital
S:  Product=My Book 1140
S:  SerialNumber=574D415A4135343330323937
C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=  2mA
I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=06 Prot=50 Driver=usb-storage
E:  Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms
E:  Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms

So I need to cat 3u .. right ? Available at
http://d3xt3r01.tk/~dexter/usbmon/1348678668_3u
After the copy .. I see

2012-09-26T19:52:51.477641+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.232213] hub
3-2:1.0: Cannot enable port 4.  Maybe the USB cable is bad?
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003074+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757636] sd
16:0:0:0: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003081+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757652] sd
16:0:0:0: [sdd] Unhandled error code
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003088+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757656] sd
16:0:0:0: [sdd]  Result: hostbyte=DID_ABORT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003095+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757663] sd
16:0:0:0: [sdd] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 17 ab ab e0 00 00 f0 00
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003101+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757680]
end_request: I/O error, dev sdd, sector 397126624
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003107+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757721] sd
16:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003112+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757730] sd
16:0:0:0: [sdd] killing request
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003118+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757750] sd
16:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003125+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757769] sd
16:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003131+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757788] sd
16:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003138+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757814] sd
16:0:0:0: [sdd] Unhandled error code
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003145+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757821] sd
16:0:0:0: [sdd]  Result: hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003152+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757829] sd
16:0:0:0: [sdd] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 17 ab ac d0 00 00 10 00
2012-09-26T19:52:52.003159+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.757849]
end_request: I/O error, dev sdd, sector 397126864
2012-09-26T19:52:52.018669+03:00 d3xt3r01 kernel: [ 1248.773433] usb
3-2.4: USB disconnect, device number 11

While trying to copy ( using mc ) from /dev/sdb1 ( mounted /media/sdd1
) to /dev/sdd1 ( mounted /media/sde1 ) .. Sorry for the confusion ..
because I don't know which ones will get in what order I use uuids in
fstab ..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux