On 09/25/2012 12:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:00 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 4 ++++
drivers/scsi/sd.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I'm not opposed in principle to doing this (except that it should be a
sysfs parameter like all our other controls), but what's the reasoning
behind needing it changed?
<vendor hat on>
Periodically turns up as a useful field sledgehammer for solving
problems, until the real problem is found and fixed. Got tired of a
very similar patch manually bouncing around the "hey, pssst, this worked
for me" backchannel IT network.
</red hat>
Can you be more specific about sysfs location? A runtime-writable (via
sysfs!) module parameter for a module-wide default seemed appropriate.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
