From: Naresh Kumar Inna <naresh@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:05:22 +0530 > On 9/11/2012 11:03 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Naresh Kumar Inna <naresh@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:09:07 +0530 >> >>> This patch contains minor fixes to make cxgb4vf driver work with the updates to >>> shared firmware/hardware header files. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Inna <naresh@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> You cannot submit a patch set that isn't bisectable, and in particular >> create a situation that mid-way through your patch set things do not >> build or operate correctly. >> > > Sorry, I am new to this process. The reason I did that was because I was > not sure if I could create a single patch with both cxgb4 and cxgb4vf > files in it, since they are two different subsystems. If I could do > that, the single patch then would build on its own, and not be dependent > on the other patches in the series. Is that something I can do? I don't know how else to say this, every step along the way the tree has to build. You arrange the patches however necessary to achieve that goal. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
