Re: [PATCH 5/8] csiostor: Chelsio FCoE offload driver submission (sources part 5).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 23:10 +0530, Naresh Kumar Inna wrote:
> On 8/24/2012 1:18 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 03:57 +0530, Naresh Kumar Inna wrote:
> >> This patch contains code to implement the interrupt handling and the fast
> >> path I/O functionality. The interrupt handling includes allocation of
> >> MSIX vectors, registering and implemeting the interrupt service routines.
> >> The fast path I/O functionality includes posting the I/O request to firmware
> >> via Work Requests, tracking/completing them, and handling task management
> >> requests. SCSI midlayer host template implementation is also covered by
> >> this patch.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Inna <naresh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Hi Naresh,
> > 
> > My review comments are inline below..
> 
> Hi Nicholas,
> 
> Thanks for taking the time to review the driver. Please find my replies
> inline.
> 
> Regards,
> Naresh.
> 
> > 
> >>  drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_isr.c  |  631 ++++++++++
> >>  drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_scsi.c | 2498 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 3129 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_isr.c
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_scsi.c
> >>

<SNIP>

> > 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_scsi.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..0f87b00
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_scsi.c
> >> +
> >> +#define CSIO_SCSI_CMD_WR_SZ(_imm)					\
> >> +	(sizeof(struct fw_scsi_cmd_wr) +		/* WR size */	\
> >> +	 ALIGN((_imm), 16))				/* Immed data */
> >> +
> >> +#define CSIO_SCSI_CMD_WR_SZ_16(_imm)					\
> >> +			(ALIGN(CSIO_SCSI_CMD_WR_SZ((_imm)), 16))
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * csio_scsi_cmd - Create a SCSI CMD WR.
> >> + * @req: IO req structure.
> >> + *
> >> + * Gets a WR slot in the ingress queue and initializes it with SCSI CMD WR.
> >> + *
> >> + */
> >> +static inline void
> >> +csio_scsi_cmd(struct csio_ioreq *req)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct csio_wr_pair wrp;
> >> +	struct csio_hw *hw = req->lnode->hwp;
> >> +	struct csio_scsim *scsim = csio_hw_to_scsim(hw);
> >> +	uint32_t size = CSIO_SCSI_CMD_WR_SZ_16(scsim->proto_cmd_len);
> >> +
> >> +	req->drv_status = csio_wr_get(hw, req->eq_idx, size, &wrp);
> >> +	if (unlikely(req->drv_status != CSIO_SUCCESS))
> >> +		return;
> >> +
> >> +	if (wrp.size1 >= size) {
> >> +		/* Initialize WR in one shot */
> >> +		csio_scsi_init_cmd_wr(req, wrp.addr1, size);
> >> +	} else {
> >> +		uint8_t tmpwr[512];
> > 
> > Mmmm, putting this large of a buffer on the local stack is probably not
> > a good idea.
> > 
> > This should become an allocation..  If it's a hot path then you'll
> > probably want to set this up before-hand.
> > 
> 
> The else switch above is entered only when we near the end of the DMA
> ring. This is not a frequent occurrence. If it is a strict no-no to have
> so many on-stack bytes, I have to think of a way re-work it to use
> pre-allocated memory. Please let me know.
> 

Considering it's used a number of times, it would be better to just
figure out a sensible manner to pre-allocate this, especially if it's
only a single occurrence to an individual ring held under a lock. 

> >> +		/*
> >> +		 * Make a temporary copy of the WR and write back
> >> +		 * the copy into the WR pair.
> >> +		 */
> >> +		csio_scsi_init_cmd_wr(req, (void *)tmpwr, size);
> >> +		memcpy(wrp.addr1, tmpwr, wrp.size1);
> >> +		memcpy(wrp.addr2, tmpwr + wrp.size1, size - wrp.size1);
> >> +	}
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * The following is fast path code. Therefore it is inlined with multi-line
> >> + * macros using name substitution, thus avoiding if-else switches for
> >> + * operation (read/write), as well as serving the purpose of code re-use.
> >> + */
> >> +/*
> >> + * csio_scsi_init_ulptx_dsgl - Fill in a ULP_TX_SC_DSGL
> >> + * @hw: HW module
> >> + * @req: IO request
> >> + * @sgl: ULP TX SGL pointer.
> >> + *
> >> + */
> >> +#define csio_scsi_init_ultptx_dsgl(hw, req, sgl)			       \
> >> +do {									       \
> >> +	struct ulptx_sge_pair *_sge_pair = NULL;			       \
> >> +	struct scatterlist *_sgel;					       \
> >> +	uint32_t _i = 0;						       \
> >> +	uint32_t _xfer_len;						       \
> >> +	struct list_head *_tmp;						       \
> >> +	struct csio_dma_buf *_dma_buf;					       \
> >> +	struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd = csio_scsi_cmnd((req));		       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	(sgl)->cmd_nsge = htonl(ULPTX_CMD(ULP_TX_SC_DSGL) | ULPTX_MORE |       \
> >> +				     ULPTX_NSGE((req)->nsge));		       \
> >> +	/* Now add the data SGLs */					       \
> >> +	if (likely(!(req)->dcopy)) {				               \
> >> +		scsi_for_each_sg(scmnd, _sgel, (req)->nsge, _i) {	       \
> >> +			if (_i == 0) {					       \
> >> +				(sgl)->addr0 = cpu_to_be64(	               \
> >> +						sg_dma_address(_sgel));	       \
> >> +				(sgl)->len0 = cpu_to_be32(		       \
> >> +						sg_dma_len(_sgel));	       \
> >> +				_sge_pair =				       \
> >> +					(struct ulptx_sge_pair *)((sgl) + 1);  \
> >> +				continue;				       \
> >> +			}						       \
> >> +			if ((_i - 1) & 0x1) {				       \
> >> +				_sge_pair->addr[1] = cpu_to_be64(	       \
> >> +						sg_dma_address(_sgel));	       \
> >> +				_sge_pair->len[1] = cpu_to_be32(	       \
> >> +						sg_dma_len(_sgel));	       \
> >> +				_sge_pair++;				       \
> >> +			} else	{					       \
> >> +				_sge_pair->addr[0] = cpu_to_be64(	       \
> >> +						sg_dma_address(_sgel));	       \
> >> +				_sge_pair->len[0] = cpu_to_be32(	       \
> >> +						sg_dma_len(_sgel));	       \
> >> +			}						       \
> >> +		}							       \
> >> +	} else {							       \
> >> +		/* Program sg elements with driver's DDP buffer */	       \
> >> +		_xfer_len = scsi_bufflen(scmnd);			       \
> >> +		list_for_each(_tmp, &(req)->gen_list) {		       \
> >> +			_dma_buf = (struct csio_dma_buf *)_tmp;		       \
> >> +			if (_i == 0) {					       \
> >> +				(sgl)->addr0 = cpu_to_be64(_dma_buf->paddr);   \
> >> +				(sgl)->len0 = cpu_to_be32(		       \
> >> +					min(_xfer_len, _dma_buf->len));        \
> >> +				_sge_pair =				       \
> >> +					(struct ulptx_sge_pair *)((sgl) + 1);  \
> >> +			}						       \
> >> +			else if ((_i - 1) & 0x1) {			       \
> >> +				_sge_pair->addr[1] = cpu_to_be64(	       \
> >> +							_dma_buf->paddr);      \
> >> +				_sge_pair->len[1] = cpu_to_be32(	       \
> >> +					min(_xfer_len, _dma_buf->len));        \
> >> +				_sge_pair++;				       \
> >> +			} else	{					       \
> >> +				_sge_pair->addr[0] = cpu_to_be64(	       \
> >> +							_dma_buf->paddr);      \
> >> +				_sge_pair->len[0] = cpu_to_be32(	       \
> >> +					min(_xfer_len, _dma_buf->len));        \
> >> +			}						       \
> >> +			_xfer_len -= min(_xfer_len, _dma_buf->len);            \
> >> +			_i++;						       \
> >> +		}							       \
> >> +	}								       \
> >> +} while (0)
> >> +
> > 
> > I don't see any reason why this can't just be a static function..?  Why
> > is the macro usage necessary here..?
> 
> OK, I will make this static-inline.
> 
> > 
> >> +/*
> >> + * csio_scsi_init_data_wr - Initialize the READ/WRITE SCSI WR.
> >> + * @req: IO req structure.
> >> + * @oper: read/write
> >> + * @wrp: DMA location to place the payload.
> >> + * @size: Size of WR (including FW WR + immed data + rsp SG entry + data SGL
> >> + * @wrop:  _READ_/_WRITE_
> >> + *
> >> + * Wrapper for populating fw_scsi_read_wr/fw_scsi_write_wr.
> >> + */
> >> +#define csio_scsi_init_data_wr(req, oper, wrp, size, wrop)		       \
> >> +do {									       \
> >> +	struct csio_hw *_hw = (req)->lnode->hwp;			       \
> >> +	struct csio_rnode *_rn = (req)->rnode;				       \
> >> +	struct fw_scsi_##oper##_wr *__wr = (struct fw_scsi_##oper##_wr *)(wrp);\
> >> +	struct ulptx_sgl *_sgl;						       \
> >> +	struct csio_dma_buf *_dma_buf;					       \
> >> +	uint8_t _imm = csio_hw_to_scsim(_hw)->proto_cmd_len;		       \
> >> +	struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd = csio_scsi_cmnd((req));		       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	__wr->op_immdlen = cpu_to_be32(FW_WR_OP(FW_SCSI##wrop##WR) |           \
> >> +					   FW_SCSI##wrop##WR_IMMDLEN(_imm));   \
> >> +	__wr->flowid_len16 = cpu_to_be32(FW_WR_FLOWID(_rn->flowid) |           \
> >> +					     FW_WR_LEN16(		       \
> >> +						CSIO_ROUNDUP((size), 16)));    \
> >> +	__wr->cookie = (uintptr_t) (req);				       \
> >> +	__wr->iqid = (uint16_t)cpu_to_be16(csio_q_physiqid(_hw,	               \
> >> +							       (req)->iq_idx));\
> >> +	__wr->tmo_val = (uint8_t)((req)->tmo);				       \
> >> +	__wr->use_xfer_cnt = 1;						       \
> >> +	__wr->xfer_cnt = cpu_to_be32(scsi_bufflen(scmnd));		       \
> >> +	__wr->ini_xfer_cnt = cpu_to_be32(scsi_bufflen(scmnd));		       \
> >> +	/* Get RSP DMA buffer */					       \
> >> +	_dma_buf = &(req)->dma_buf;					       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	/* Prepare RSP SGL */						       \
> >> +	__wr->rsp_dmalen = cpu_to_be32(_dma_buf->len);		               \
> >> +	__wr->rsp_dmaaddr = cpu_to_be64(_dma_buf->paddr);		       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	__wr->r4 = 0;							       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	__wr->u.fcoe.ctl_pri = 0;					       \
> >> +	__wr->u.fcoe.cp_en_class = 0;					       \
> >> +	__wr->u.fcoe.r3_lo[0] = 0;					       \
> >> +	__wr->u.fcoe.r3_lo[1] = 0;					       \
> >> +	csio_scsi_fcp_cmnd((req), (void *)((uintptr_t)(wrp) +		       \
> >> +				   sizeof(struct fw_scsi_##oper##_wr)));       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	/* Move WR pointer past command and immediate data */		       \
> >> +	_sgl = (struct ulptx_sgl *) ((uintptr_t)(wrp) +			       \
> >> +			      sizeof(struct fw_scsi_##oper##_wr) +	       \
> >> +			      ALIGN(_imm, 16));			               \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	/* Fill in the DSGL */						       \
> >> +	csio_scsi_init_ultptx_dsgl(_hw, (req), _sgl);			       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +} while (0)
> >> +
> > 
> > This one has four uses of CPP keys.  Just turn those into macros, and
> > leave the rest of the code in a static function.
> > 
> 
> So what you are suggesting is to have all the lines of the macro
> csio_scsi_init_data_wr() added into a static function, but for the ones
> with the 4 keys. csio_scsi_init_data_wr() will then invoke this new
> function. Is that correct?
> 

Not sure how the above should actually look without actually doing it,
but IMHO the usage of macro just obfuscates what is going on..

If it's only used a few times, just inline the code into seperate static
functions.  If it's used more than a few times, then use a single static
funciton with macro accessors for the assignment of the various '__wr'
structure members.

The larger problem with all of these macros is that you can't tell what
is a macro and what is a function.

If you need to use a CPP macro, please make sure to capitalize the name
of the macro in order to tell the difference between the two.

> >> +/* Calculate WR size needed for fw_scsi_read_wr/fw_scsi_write_wr */
> >> +#define csio_scsi_data_wrsz(req, oper, sz, imm)				       \
> >> +do {									       \
> >> +	(sz) = sizeof(struct fw_scsi_##oper##_wr) +	/* WR size */          \
> >> +	       ALIGN((imm), 16) +			/* Immed data */       \
> >> +	       sizeof(struct ulptx_sgl);		/* ulptx_sgl */	       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	if (unlikely((req)->nsge > 1))				               \
> >> +		(sz) += (sizeof(struct ulptx_sge_pair) *		       \
> >> +				(ALIGN(((req)->nsge - 1), 2) / 2));            \
> >> +							/* Data SGE */	       \
> >> +} while (0)
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * csio_scsi_data - Create a SCSI WRITE/READ WR.
> >> + * @req: IO req structure.
> >> + * @oper: read/write
> >> + * @wrop:  _READ_/_WRITE_ (string subsitutions to use with the FW bit field
> >> + *         macros).
> >> + *
> >> + * Gets a WR slot in the ingress queue and initializes it with
> >> + * SCSI CMD READ/WRITE WR.
> >> + *
> >> + */
> >> +#define csio_scsi_data(req, oper, wrop)					       \
> >> +do {									       \
> >> +	struct csio_wr_pair _wrp;					       \
> >> +	uint32_t _size;							       \
> >> +	struct csio_hw *_hw = (req)->lnode->hwp;			       \
> >> +	struct csio_scsim *_scsim = csio_hw_to_scsim(_hw);		       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	csio_scsi_data_wrsz((req), oper, _size, _scsim->proto_cmd_len);	       \
> >> +	_size = ALIGN(_size, 16);					       \
> >> +									       \
> >> +	(req)->drv_status = csio_wr_get(_hw, (req)->eq_idx, _size, &_wrp);     \
> >> +	if (likely((req)->drv_status == CSIO_SUCCESS)) {		       \
> >> +		if (likely(_wrp.size1 >= _size)) {			       \
> >> +			/* Initialize WR in one shot */			       \
> >> +			csio_scsi_init_data_wr((req), oper, _wrp.addr1,        \
> >> +						    _size, wrop);	       \
> >> +		} else {						       \
> >> +			uint8_t tmpwr[512];				       \
> >> +			/*						       \
> >> +			 * Make a temporary copy of the WR and write back      \
> >> +			 * the copy into the WR pair.			       \
> >> +			 */						       \
> >> +			csio_scsi_init_data_wr((req), oper, (void *)tmpwr,     \
> >> +						    _size, wrop);	       \
> >> +			memcpy(_wrp.addr1, tmpwr, _wrp.size1);	               \
> >> +			memcpy(_wrp.addr2, tmpwr + _wrp.size1,	               \
> >> +				    _size - _wrp.size1);		       \
> >> +		}							       \
> >> +	}								       \
> >> +} while (0)
> >> +
> > 
> > Ditto on this one, along with the tmpwr[512] stack usage..
> > 
> >> +static inline void
> >> +csio_scsi_abrt_cls(struct csio_ioreq *req, bool abort)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct csio_wr_pair wrp;
> >> +	struct csio_hw *hw = req->lnode->hwp;
> >> +	uint32_t size = ALIGN(sizeof(struct fw_scsi_abrt_cls_wr), 16);
> >> +
> >> +	req->drv_status = csio_wr_get(hw, req->eq_idx, size, &wrp);
> >> +	if (req->drv_status != CSIO_SUCCESS)
> >> +		return;
> >> +
> >> +	if (wrp.size1 >= size) {
> >> +		/* Initialize WR in one shot */
> >> +		csio_scsi_init_abrt_cls_wr(req, wrp.addr1, size, abort);
> >> +	} else {
> >> +		uint8_t tmpwr[512];
> > 
> > Ditto here on local scope stack usage..
> > 
> >> +		/*
> >> +		 * Make a temporary copy of the WR and write back
> >> +		 * the copy into the WR pair.
> >> +		 */
> >> +		csio_scsi_init_abrt_cls_wr(req, (void *)tmpwr, size, abort);
> >> +		memcpy(wrp.addr1, tmpwr, wrp.size1);
> >> +		memcpy(wrp.addr2, tmpwr + wrp.size1, size - wrp.size1);
> >> +	}
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*****************************************************************************/
> >> +/* START: SCSI SM                                                            */
> >> +/*****************************************************************************/
> >> +static void
> >> +csio_scsis_uninit(struct csio_ioreq *req, enum csio_scsi_ev evt)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct csio_hw *hw = req->lnode->hwp;
> >> +	struct csio_scsim *scsim = csio_hw_to_scsim(hw);
> >> +
> >> +	switch (evt) {
> >> +
> >> +	case CSIO_SCSIE_START_IO:
> > 
> > Extra space between start of first switch case
> 
> OK, I will remove it. Is there any tool that catches such deviations?
> checkpath.pl didnt report it.
> 

Sorry, can't help you there..  ;)

> > 
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * csio_queuecommand_lck - Entry point to kickstart an I/O request.
> >> + * @cmnd:	The I/O request from ML.
> >> + * @done:	The ML callback routine.
> >> + *
> >> + * This routine does the following:
> >> + *	- Checks for HW and Rnode module readiness.
> >> + *	- Gets a free ioreq structure (which is already initialized
> >> + *	  to uninit during its allocation).
> >> + *	- Maps SG elements.
> >> + *	- Initializes ioreq members.
> >> + *	- Kicks off the SCSI state machine for this IO.
> >> + *	- Returns busy status on error.
> >> + */
> >> +static int
> >> +csio_queuecommand_lck(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd, void (*done)(struct scsi_cmnd *))
> >> +{
> >> +	struct csio_lnode *ln = shost_priv(cmnd->device->host);
> >> +	struct csio_hw *hw = csio_lnode_to_hw(ln);
> >> +	struct csio_scsim *scsim = csio_hw_to_scsim(hw);
> >> +	struct csio_rnode *rn = (struct csio_rnode *)(cmnd->device->hostdata);
> >> +	struct csio_ioreq *ioreq = NULL;
> >> +	unsigned long flags;
> >> +	int nsge = 0;
> >> +	int rv = SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY, nr;
> >> +	csio_retval_t retval;
> >> +	int cpu;
> >> +	struct csio_scsi_qset *sqset;
> >> +	struct fc_rport *rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(cmnd->device));
> >> +
> >> +	if (!blk_rq_cpu_valid(cmnd->request))
> >> +		cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >> +	else
> >> +		cpu = cmnd->request->cpu;
> >> +
> >> +	sqset = &hw->sqset[ln->portid][cpu];
> >> +
> >> +	nr = fc_remote_port_chkready(rport);
> >> +	if (nr) {
> >> +		cmnd->result = nr;
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(scsim, n_rn_nr_error);
> >> +		goto err_done;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	if (unlikely(!csio_is_hw_ready(hw))) {
> >> +		cmnd->result = (DID_REQUEUE << 16);
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(scsim, n_hw_nr_error);
> >> +		goto err_done;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	/* Get req->nsge, if there are SG elements to be mapped  */
> >> +	nsge = scsi_dma_map(cmnd);
> >> +	if (unlikely(nsge < 0)) {
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(scsim, n_dmamap_error);
> >> +		goto err;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	/* Do we support so many mappings? */
> >> +	if (unlikely(nsge > scsim->max_sge)) {
> >> +		csio_warn(hw,
> >> +			  "More SGEs than can be supported."
> >> +			  " SGEs: %d, Max SGEs: %d\n", nsge, scsim->max_sge);
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(scsim, n_unsupp_sge_error);
> >> +		goto err_dma_unmap;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	/* Get a free ioreq structure - SM is already set to uninit */
> >> +	ioreq = csio_get_scsi_ioreq_lock(hw, scsim);
> >> +	if (!ioreq) {
> >> +		csio_err(hw, "Out of I/O request elements. Active #:%d\n",
> >> +			 scsim->stats.n_active);
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(scsim, n_no_req_error);
> >> +		goto err_dma_unmap;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	ioreq->nsge		= nsge;
> >> +	ioreq->lnode		= ln;
> >> +	ioreq->rnode		= rn;
> >> +	ioreq->iq_idx		= sqset->iq_idx;
> >> +	ioreq->eq_idx		= sqset->eq_idx;
> >> +	ioreq->wr_status	= 0;
> >> +	ioreq->drv_status	= CSIO_SUCCESS;
> >> +	csio_scsi_cmnd(ioreq)	= (void *)cmnd;
> >> +	ioreq->tmo		= 0;
> >> +
> >> +	switch (cmnd->sc_data_direction) {
> >> +	case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL:
> >> +		ioreq->datadir = CSIO_IOREQF_DMA_BIDI;
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(ln, n_control_requests);
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case DMA_TO_DEVICE:
> >> +		ioreq->datadir = CSIO_IOREQF_DMA_WRITE;
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(ln, n_output_requests);
> >> +		ln->stats.n_output_bytes += scsi_bufflen(cmnd);
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case DMA_FROM_DEVICE:
> >> +		ioreq->datadir = CSIO_IOREQF_DMA_READ;
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(ln, n_input_requests);
> >> +		ln->stats.n_input_bytes += scsi_bufflen(cmnd);
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case DMA_NONE:
> >> +		ioreq->datadir = CSIO_IOREQF_DMA_NONE;
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(ln, n_control_requests);
> >> +		break;
> >> +	default:
> >> +		CSIO_DB_ASSERT(0);
> >> +		break;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	/* Set cbfn */
> >> +	ioreq->io_cbfn = csio_scsi_cbfn;
> >> +
> >> +	/* Needed during abort */
> >> +	cmnd->host_scribble = (unsigned char *)ioreq;
> >> +	cmnd->scsi_done = done;
> >> +	cmnd->SCp.Message = 0;
> >> +
> >> +	/* Kick off SCSI IO SM on the ioreq */
> >> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&hw->lock, flags);
> >> +	retval = csio_scsi_start_io(ioreq);
> >> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hw->lock, flags);
> >> +
> >> +	if (retval != CSIO_SUCCESS) {
> >> +		csio_err(hw, "ioreq: %p couldnt be started, status:%d\n",
> >> +			 ioreq, retval);
> >> +		csio_inc_stats(scsim, n_busy_error);
> >> +		goto err_put_req;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +
> >> +err_put_req:
> >> +	csio_put_scsi_ioreq_lock(hw, scsim, ioreq);
> >> +err_dma_unmap:
> >> +	if (nsge > 0)
> >> +		scsi_dma_unmap(cmnd);
> >> +err:
> >> +	return rv;
> >> +
> >> +err_done:
> >> +	done(cmnd);
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static DEF_SCSI_QCMD(csio_queuecommand);
> >> +
> > 
> > This means that your running with the host_lock held..  I'm not sure if
> > that is really what you want to do as it really end's up killing
> > multi-lun small packet performance..
> > 
> > How about dropping DEF_SCSI_QCMD usage here, and figure out what
> > actually needs to be protected by the SCSI host_lock within
> > csio_queuecommand_lck()..?
> 
> It is on my TODO list for the next version of the driver, after the
> initial submission. Per the current design, we shouldnt need the
> host_lock to be held, but I would like to test this change thoroughly
> before I submit it.
> 

Sure, it's really quite easy to convert and these days the majority of
high performance LLDs do run in host-lock-less mode.

IIRC the libfc based FCoE initiator driver is doing this too..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux