Il 17/07/2012 11:11, James Bottomley ha scritto: > We don't do stuff just because the standards allows it; just the > opposite: we try to use the smallest implementations from the standards > we can get away with just because the more things we do, the more > exceptions and broken devices we come across. Yes, I realize failing only on specific sense codes as I did it in the patch is not going to work. However, the other way round is not problematic (explicitly allow some sense codes, fail on all others). Another example is "target operating conditions have changed". QEMU cannot report such changes because scsi_error prints a warning (fine) and then passes the unit attention upwards. With removable drives, this has the same problem as resizing. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
