On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 18:56 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 18:40 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > OK, I'll take a look at how you handle this...
> >
> > So looking at commit bc187ea6c3b3 in the tree you just pushed out
> > ("target: Check sess_tearing_down in target_get_sess_cmd()") it looks
> > like you just return from target_submit_cmd() if we fail to add the
> > command to sess_cmd_list -- doesn't this mean we just leak those
> > commands and possibly leave the HW sitting there with open exchanges?
> >
>
> With dropping patch #5 for now, I assume that would be the case..
>
Or with patch #4 even..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
