On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 13:48 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:09:19AM +0100, David Laight wrote: > > > Subject: [patch] [SCSI] bnx2i: use strlcpy() instead of memcpy() for > > strings > > > > > > DRV_MODULE_VERSION here is "2.7.2.2" which is only 8 chars but we copy > > > 12 bytes from the stack so it's a small information leak. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > This was just added to linux-next yesterday, but I'm not sure > > > which tree it came from. > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c > > > b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c > > > index 7729a52..b17637a 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_init.c > > > @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ int bnx2i_get_stats(void *handle) > > > if (!stats) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > > > - memcpy(stats->version, DRV_MODULE_VERSION, > > sizeof(stats->version)); > > > + strlcpy(stats->version, DRV_MODULE_VERSION, > > sizeof(stats->version)); > > > memcpy(stats->mac_add1 + 2, hba->cnic->mac_addr, ETH_ALEN); > > > > Doesn't that leak the original contents of the last bytes of > > stats->version instead? > > I'm pretty sure we set those to zero in bnx2x_handle_drv_info_req(). > Yes, bnx2x zeros the whole stats structure, so strlcpy() is correct. This came from the net-next tree, so David is the right persion to apply this. Thanks. Acked-by: Michael Chan <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
