On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Set5 of 5 patchsets to update scsi, libsas, and libata in > support of the isci driver. > > Commit 43a8d39d "[SCSI] fix async probe regression" found that > async_synchronize_full() was missing async work that was scheduled to > its own domain. This led James to note: > > "My theory is that this is an init problem: The assumption in a lot of > our code is that async_synchronize_full() waits for everything ... even > the domain specific async schedules, which isn't true." > > ...and this set aims to make that assumption true, but also with the > ability to opt-out for "private" async work. > > The other async probe fix is in the area of unplug events that occur in > the scsi async scanning interval. Essentially scsi_remove_target() can > now see semi-initialized scsi_targets that have yet to be added via > device_add(). > > If there are no objections I'll put these in -next. But I expect at > least patch1 and patch2 will need an ack from Arjan before the set shows > up in scsi.git. > > --- James, I caught a couple conflicts with scsi.git/for-next and was able to fix them up without rebasing on top of your tree. I'll resend the series after letting these sit in -next for a while, or I can prepare a tag for you to pull with the whole pending set. > > Dan Williams (6): > async: introduce 'async_domain' type dropped the include of async.h > async: make async_synchronize_full() flush all work regardless of domain > scsi: queue async scan work to an async_schedule domain > scsi: cleanup usages of scsi_complete_async_scans dropped the changes to scsi_wait_scan.c since that file is deleted in your for-next branch. -- Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
