Re: [patch -resend] [SCSI] megaraid: remove a spurious IRQ enable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We took this lock with spin_lock() so we should unlock it with
> spin_unlock() instead of spin_unlock_irq().  This was introduced in
> f2c8dc402b "[SCSI] megaraid_mbox: remove scsi_assign_lock usage".
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This was originally sent on Sat, 30 Jul 2011.  I have cleaned up the
> commit message a bit and added Christoph to the CC list.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
> index 35bd138..54b1c5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c
> @@ -2731,7 +2731,7 @@ megaraid_reset_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *scp)
>        }
>
>  out:
> -       spin_unlock_irq(&adapter->lock);
> +       spin_unlock(&adapter->lock);
>        return rval;
>  }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Acked-by: Adam Radford <aradford@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux