On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Eldad Zack <eldad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Dan Williams wrote: >> In response to an async related regression James noted: >> >> "My theory is that this is an init problem: The assumption in a lot of >> our code is that async_synchronize_full() waits for everything ... even >> the domain specific async schedules, which isn't true." >> >> ...so make this assumption true. > > Hi Dan, > > I've applied the all 6 patches of this set. > (HEAD 8874e812feb4926f4a51a82c4fca75c7daa05fc5 , Linus' tree) > > I've tested it on the same setup and everything runs fine, and I've > seen no suspicious messages. > > If you'd like, I can test only patch #2 in isolation. No, I think the testing you've done is enough. > Tested-by: Eldad Zack <eldad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Much appreciated. -- Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
