On 06/05/12 21:32, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:10:15PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> Some request_queue.end_io implementations can be called safely >> without the queue lock held while several other implementations >> assume that the queue lock is held. So let's play it safe and >> make sure that the queue lock is held around end_io invocations. >> Found this through source code review. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Not sure about stable@ tho. This doesn't fix any visible issue at the > moment and any change carries some risk. I don't have a strong opinion about cc-ing stable - leaving out that tag is fine for me. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
