On Mon, 21 May 2012 10:35:36 -0400 Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] [SCSI] ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in ufshcd_probe. Nit: conventionally, the text inside [] is to be discarded by the patch recipient, so the title of this patch is ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in ufshcd_probe. which makes it look like a patch against fs/ufs/! There is a fashion lately of people prefixing patch titles along the lines of scsi: ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in ufshcd_probe. or even drivers: scsi: ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in ufshcd_probe. that's nuts, and I regularly turn this into a proper pathname - why not? drivers/scsi/ufs: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing error in ufshcd_probe. I'll stop now :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
