Ok, understood. On 05/17/2012 12:35 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 20:56 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote: >> st currently allocates an array to store pointers to all of the >> scsi_tape objects. It's used to discover available indexes to use as the >> base for the minor number selection and later to look up scsi_tape >> devices for character devices. >> >> We switch to using an IDR for minor selection and a pointer from >> st_modedef back to scsi_tape for the lookups. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@xxxxxxxx> > > This can't be Reviewed-by either. The signoff chain has to follow the > transmission path of the patch. If you send me Jeff's patches, you have > to add a signoff because you're a direct part of the transmission path. > If Jeff sends me them, then he can give you Reviewed-by because you're > not then in the direct transmission path. (Signoff is supposed to imply > reviewed by anyway, so the tagging is correct in either case). > > James > > > -- Lee Duncan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
