On 05/07/2012 07:14 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 05/07/2012 06:31 PM, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote:
>> On 05/04/2012 08:49 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> On 04/24/2012 05:26 PM, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote:
>>> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_tgt.c
>>> b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_tgt.c
>>> > index d3ee231..082a25c 100644
>>> > --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_tgt.c
>>> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_tgt.c
>>> > @@ -185,6 +185,16 @@ void bnx2fc_flush_active_ios(struct bnx2fc_rport
>>> *tgt)
>>> > BUG_ON(rc);
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> > + list_for_each_safe(list, tmp, &tgt->active_tm_queue) {
>>> > + i++;
>>> > + io_req = (struct bnx2fc_cmd *)list;
>>>
>>> Why didn't you use list_for_each_entry_safe()? Or, when using
>>> list_for_each_safe, instead of the cast are we supposed to be using
>>> list_entry()?
>>
>> Mike, the list is the first field in the structure, so the cast here is
>> right.
>>
>
> I am saying that normally if there is a function that does the same
> thing we are supposed to use that instead.
I think though since it works and it used throughout the driver already
it is ok to do. But I think in a patch later it should be changed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
