Re: RE [PATCH] pm8001: support HDA (flashless) mode (take 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I had viewed the hot-plug changes as separate (I see now that was a bogus distinction), I will merge them in.

Yes, the check_fw_ready is not needed, but was left in as an attempt to not touch the 'good path' for the other modes, I saw it as it could not hurt. I will test without it, and ensure operation in both our upstream code (?) and the kernel.org patch to be 100% sure. I was admittedly paranoid about removing that one. I had been experimenting and thinking about this one ever since Take-2 left the gate and am not yet satisfied.

I appreciate the comments, a sign of a deep dive into this one! Thanks!

Take-3 will arrive after testing, I will send you a PM preview to confirm ...

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn

On May 2, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Jack Wang wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> 
> I found other issue in this patch need to be addressed. when HDA mode is
> enable, we need also change the soft reset signature to HDA signature in
> pci_remove/suspend/resume function.
> 
> and in pm8001_chip_init, check fw ready is not need for HDA mode.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux