Re: [PATCH 03/12] libata, libsas: introduce sched_eh and end_eh port ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 16:37 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> When managing shost->host_eh_scheduled libata assumes that there is a
> 1:1 shost-to-ata_port relationship.  libsas creates a 1:N relationship
> so it needs to manage host_eh_scheduled cumulatively at the host level.
> The sched_eh and end_eh port port ops allow libsas to track when domain
> devices enter/leave the "eh-pending" state under ha->lock (previously
> named ha->state_lock, but it is no longer just a lock for ha->state
> changes).
> 
> Since host_eh_scheduled indicates eh without backing commands pinning
> the device it can be deallocated at any time.  Move the taking of the
> domain_device reference under the port_lock to guarantee that the
> ata_port stays around for the duration of eh.

> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jacek Danecki <jacek.danecki@xxxxxxxxx>

Could we standardise on Acked-by, please.  In my book it means the
maintainer of a piece of code agrees with the change and lets me take it
through my tree.  I'm aware that not everyone uses this definition, so
we can use a different standard from my current one, but what does it
mean in this case?

> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c           |    4 ++
>  drivers/ata/libata-eh.c             |   57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c       |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c  |    6 ++--
>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_event.c     |   12 ++++---
>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_init.c      |   14 ++++-----
>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c |   27 +++++++++++++----
>  include/linux/libata.h              |    4 ++
>  include/scsi/libsas.h               |    4 ++
>  include/scsi/sas_ata.h              |    5 +++
>  10 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

This is a pretty big change for rc fixes.  None of the other changes in
the series seem to be dependent on it, what bug is it actually fixing?

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux