This reverts commit a692b0eec5efae382dfa800e8b4b083f172921a7.
Tom reports:
[ 8.741033] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 8.741038] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:508 sysfs_add_one+0xc1/0xf0()
[ 8.741040] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
[ 8.741041] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
...and missing 2 out of 4 drives connected to mvsas. Commit a692b0ee
made the assumption that all the phy ids an lldd registers to libsas are
unique. However, in the "multi-chip" case mvsas does a rather annoying
duplication of phy ids in the array passed to libsas. So, for example,
chip0 has phy0-3 at ha phy index 0-3 and chip1 has its phy0-3 at ha phy
index 4-7. The more natural model would be to create a scsi_host (and
sas_ha) per chip (controller), but for now revert the naming fix which
unfortunately means dealing with unpredictable end-device names for a
bit longer.
Cc: Xiangliang Yu <yuxiangl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Patrick Thomson <patrick.s.thomson@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxx>
Tested-by: Tom Rini <trini@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Any heartburn if I submit this plus the pending libsas-fixes to Linus?
I don't want to miss rc4.
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_port.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_port.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_port.c
index 1cf7d75..e884a8c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_port.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_port.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void sas_form_port(struct asd_sas_phy *phy)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sas_ha->phy_port_lock, flags);
if (!port->port) {
- port->port = sas_port_alloc(phy->phy->dev.parent, phy->id);
+ port->port = sas_port_alloc(phy->phy->dev.parent, port->id);
BUG_ON(!port->port);
sas_port_add(port->port);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
