On 04/11/2012 09:21 AM, Asias He wrote:
On 04/10/2012 11:53 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:49:43AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, guys.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:34:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Why not use 'base' below? neither unit nor base change.
Yes it's a bit strange, it was the same in Tejun's patch.
Tejun, any idea?
It was years ago, so I don't recall much. I think I wanted to use a
variable name which signifies its role - I worked out the rather
convoluted base number logic on paper first and I probably wanted to
keep the distinctions. I don't think it really matters at this point
tho. Just make sure those functions are marked deprecated so that no
one else copies them.
Thanks.
I guess I'll keep it same so it's easier to deduplicate
if someon wants to.
So, I'd keep this in the next version.
Why not fix it both in sd_format_disk_name() and virtblk_name_format().
Ren, mind to send v2 to drop the duplicate line?
I'll send v2 soon.
--
Thanks,
Ren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
