On 04/06/2012 07:54 PM, Alex Shi wrote: > Without the following patch, the driver will have many complain after > smp_processor_id debug enabled. > > So would you like consider to pick this patch or find a better way to > remove them? Anyone like to have a look on the following complain? > > Call Trace:^M > [<ffffffff81325f77>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe7/0x100^M > [<ffffffffa0016324>] mpt2sas_base_put_smid_default+0x34/0x70 [mpt2sas]^M > [<ffffffffa0016472>] _base_event_notification+0x112/0x240 [mpt2sas]^M > [<ffffffffa0016a11>] _base_make_ioc_operational+0x471/0x1240 [mpt2sas]^M > [<ffffffff810b9963>] ? lockdep_init_map+0xa3/0x560^M > [<ffffffff810be4fd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10d/0x1a0^M > [<ffffffff810b8588>] ? debug_mutex_init+0x38/0x50^M > [<ffffffffa00193c7>] mpt2sas_base_attach+0x1237/0x1630 [mpt2sas]^M > [<ffffffffa001ecf8>] _scsih_probe+0x408/0x620 [mpt2sas]^M > [<ffffffff8133c64c>] local_pci_probe+0x5c/0xd0^M > [<ffffffff8133df41>] pci_device_probe+0x101/0x120^M > [<ffffffff814190dc>] driver_probe_device+0x9c/0x300^M > [<ffffffff814193eb>] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0^M > [<ffffffff81419340>] ? driver_probe_device+0x300/0x300^M > [<ffffffff8141747e>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5e/0x90^M > [<ffffffff81418cee>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20^M > [<ffffffff814188e0>] bus_add_driver+0x1c0/0x2b0^M > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
