>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: Mike> This patch fixed the issue for me (though I'm still missing why Mike> bio->bi_phys_segments was 0 given blkdev_issue_write_same() sets Mike> it): Ok, I see what's going on. You have your own dm-specific make request function. When cloning the original bio phys_segments isn't carried over. And that's why we see 0 in sd. For discard this is not a problem because we hardwire things in sd.c regardless of what was passed down. And besides you have special handling for mapping discards in DM. I was trying to avoid perpetuating Christoph's horrible hack (his words, not mine). But maybe it's better to do it the same way as for discard so we only have to have to deal with pure evil in one place. I'll contemplate a bit... PS. The good news is that your async stuff works when I set phys_segs to 1 in sd. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
