On Thu, Feb 16 2012 at 3:46pm -0500, Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Mike> Given the feedback you've gotten so far I'd imagine you're well on > Mike> your way with a new patchset (building on your discard merge > Mike> cleanup, etc). > > Yeah, tweaked a few things based on your comments. > > > Mike> I think it'd be more appropriate to put patch 4 and 5 (scsi > Mike> support) at the beginning of the patchset (block interfaces aren't > Mike> functional without underlying scsi support). > > The SCSI patches depend on the block layer ditto (topology parameters > need to be present, etc.). Ah ok, I missed the call to blk_queue_max_write_same_sectors(). > Also, we always do it this way so we can get the block layer changes in > during the merge window and then add the SCSI bits to the post-merge > tree. Got it, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
