Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] Future writeback topics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/22/2012 05:49 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> But this topic then becomes adding alignment for non block backed
> filesystems?  I take it you're thinking NFS rather than MTD or MMC?
> 

Sorry to differ. But no this is for most making the IO aligned in the first
place. Block-dev or not. Today VFS has no notion of alignment and IO is
submitted as is with out any alignment considerations.

> For multiple devices, you do a simple cascade ... a bit like dm does
> today ... but unless all the devices are aligned to optimal I/O it never
> really works (and it's not necessarily worth solving ... the idea that
> if you want performance from an array of devices, you match
> characteristics isn't a hugely hard one to get the industry to swallow).
> 

No I'm talking about raid configurations like object raid in exofs/NFS or
raid0/5 in BTRFS and ZFS and such, where there are other larger alignment
structures to consider. Also for large-blocks filesystems/devices who
would like IO aligned on bigger than a page sizes.

Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux